Thursday, January 3, 2008

RESPA - Why You Should Care

From my experience, almost every real estate professional has unwittingly violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) at some point in their career. You probably want to know what constitutes a violation, which we will get to. First, I find it effective to explain the potential penalties, which include the following:
  • Up to a $10,000 fine, or
  • Imprisonment for up to one year, or both
  • Treble (triple) damages for any actual damages (closing costs)
  • Court costs, and reasonable attorney's fees
If that doesn't get your attention, you must value you money and freedom less than I do. In general RESPA applies to real estate professionals in two instances:
  1. Prohibition of kickbacks and unearned fees [12 USC 2607]
  2. Sellers requiring a specified title company [12 USC 2608]
The first one is pretty straight forward, you are not to "accept any fee, kickback or thing of value pursuant to any agreement or understanding" that is related to or part of a real estate settlement service involving a federally regulated mortgage loan. To put it plainly, you can not get referral fees from your friendly hometown closing company.

The second one, although not directly applicable to the real estate professional, is still important. As a fiduciary (trusted adviser), you have a duty to disclose what you know to your client. Don't let your sellers make the sale conditional on a certain title insurance company, or they will be opening themselves up to treble (triple) damages for the amount paid for the title insurance, and you will have one very unhappy client.

As you often hear, "certain exclusions may apply" which pertains to RESPA as well. There are certain real estate transactions and mortgages that are not covered by RESPA, but to be safe the $50 kickback is hardly worth the risk.

2 comments:

Doug Miller said...

Nice post.

I think further clarification should be made regarding fiduciary responsibilities. As an attorney, you are a fiduciary and are probably well aware of the far reaching responsibilities of fidelity. A fiduciary must always represent their client's interest above all others, ESPECIALLY their own (self dealing).

Being a fiduciary does not just mean disclosing conflicts of interest. In fact, a fiduciary's first job is to avoid engaging in a relationship that is plagued by a conflict.

The worst conflicts are those that go to the duty of loyalty. Things like dual agency and self dealing. Then there are the duties of accounting, due diligence etc...

Now add in the licensing scheme that creates a hiearchy between the broker's license and the sales license. The broker is responsible for supervising their agents, including without limitation the adherence of fiduciary duties.

So what happens when a broker trains their agents to use their in-house title or mortgage company? When the broker tells the agent that the only way to keep their fees low or to help out the company is to use the in-house services? What happens when the broker hands out a list of objections and how to address them if the client wants the agent to help them find a title or mortgage provider outside the "family." What happens when the in-house title company is expensive?

Disclosure is not the standard. In fact, in most class actions on this topic, once you prove a prima facie case that there did exist a conflict of interest, the burden of proof switches to the defendant to prove that they obtained informed consent. Not an easy standard.

When a fiduciary takes a kickback, it also may fall under the State's commercial bribery laws (depending on the State).

The point is, RESPA is just a minimum standard when it comes to fiduciaries. Fiduciaries are going to be held to a much much higher standard.

Doug Miller
www.realestateethics.blogspot.com

Jonathan W. Davis said...

Doug

Thanks for the comment. You have brought up a lot of good points, and future topics for the blog. I would be interested to know how you found my blog within 12 hours of being up. I hope you keep reading and I will take a look at your blog soon.

Legal Disclaimer

The The information contained in this Site is for general guidance on matters of interest only. The application and impact of laws can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. Given the changing nature of laws, rules and regulations, and the inherent hazards of electronic communication, there may be delays, omissions or inaccuracies in information contained in this Site. Accordingly, the information on this Site is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with an attorney or other competent adviser. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult an attorney.

While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this Site has been obtained from reliable sources, the author or his firm is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this Site is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event will the author, his firm, or partners, agents or employees thereof be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this Site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Certain links in this Site connect to other Web Sites maintained by third parties over whom the author or his firm has no control. the author makes no representations as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other Web Sites.